|
BAMBOO PRESERVATION COMPENDIUM
by Walter Liese and Satish
Kumar |
|
Sap-replacement Treatment
|
Pages 129-137 without figures
Principle
The so-called sap-replacement treatment provides the best protection for
bamboo culms regarding both culm penetration as well as the safe use of
the treated culms. It is generally known as the “Boucherie-process”
after the French inventor Auguste Boucherie (1840) and has been applied
long since for the treatment of freshly felled trees used for telephone
poles. In its conventional form the preservative solution (e.g. CuSO4,
ZnCl2) is forced by pressure into the butt-end of the trunk
with the bark intact whilst the sap drains away from the top end (due to a
hydraulic pressure of 1 bar originating from a vessel with the
preservative placed at 10 m elevation, e.g., a tower) which is connected
by pipes to the butt-end of the stem. This gravity system is still
practised by placing a tank high enough to create sufficient hydrostatic
pressure.
Purushotham et al. (1954)
developed the system for bamboo known as the “Modified Boucherie
Treatment” using first a simple bicycle pump (Fig. 95). The method was
investigated further during a FAO consultancy 1957/58 (Liese 1959)
regarding its influencing parameters, like culm age, moisture content,
direction of flow, preservative, concentration, and pressure. The improved
method is now widely used in several countries (e.g. EBF 1994; Gonzales
and Gutiérrez 1996; Liese et al. 1998; Cusack 1999). For a better
understanding of the principle, the term “sap-replacement treatment”
appears more appropriate. The principle of the process is based on a
pressure pump that pushes a preservative solution through the entire
length of the culm, so that the sap in the vessels is replaced by the
preservative. Sap-replacement is a safe and environmentally friendly
treatment for bamboo culms as the preservative remains entirely inside the
culm. The clean surface does not cause any harm when touched.
Several
parameters have to be considered for a successful treatment
Requirements
and Preparation of Bamboo Culm
The
bamboo to be used should be about 3-4 years old. Younger culms with a
higher moisture content are easier to treat but tend to collapse and split
during subsequent drying; older ones may have insufficient moisture. The
culms must be free of defects, like lesions and insect holes, which will
block the pathways. The bamboo must be treated promptly, on the day of
harvesting and consequently cutting, transport and treatment have to be
well organized.
Before treatment, the culms should be kept under shade and cross-ends
should be covered with damp cloths to stop them drying out. Ideally the
culms should be cut to size only at the treatment site to avoid additional
open ends which lose moisture and suck in air. If a cutting has to be done
at the forest for transport reasons, one extra internode should be left on
both ends to reduce water loss and cut-off later. Just before the culm is
clamped into the nozzle of the pipe a fresh cut of some centimetres has to
be made at both ends with a very sharp knife to guarantee water-filled
vessels with no air pockets. A fine saw might cause tattered fibres to
block the vessels. The cut should be made near a node using its
irregularity to ensure a better fastening of the rubber sleeve. If a culm
portion is to be treated where branching begins, a stub of about 30 cm
should be left so that no preservative is likely to leak out. After
treatment the stubs should be cut off and disposed of accordingly.
If
the bamboo cannot be treated within 12 hours of harvesting a soaking in
fresh, clean water in a tank, pond or stream is needed. A storage time of
some days will additionally moisten the bamboo tissue and is recommended
in the dry season when culm moisture is naturally low. Given that the
culms float easily they have to be kept submerged with sinker loads (Fig.
96).
Before
treatment the amount of culm volume should be calculated to obtain an esteem
of the time required. The figure is obtained by measuring the
average outer culm circumference (at the base and at the top) multiplied
by culm length and subtracting the average inner circumference multiplied
by culm length. As the vessel volume is less then 10% of the culm wall a
treated volume of 10%, as measured by the outflow in cubic cm, would
ensure this is accomplished. Vessel volume varies between species and
their origin and therefore determines the speed and time of the flow. A
study on two Guaduas from Costa Rica has shown distinct differences in
vessel area between the two which could account for the different
treatment times (Liese et al. 1998).
Preservative
The
water content of the vessels is replaced under pressure by a preservative
with the result that the culm is “treated”. However, to achieve such
protection the vessels’ surroundings must be penetrated by a subsequent
diffusion. Therefore, non-fixing salts are more suitable than fixing salts,
whereby boron-salts are most commonly and successfully used. Their
concentration ranges between 5-10%. In Costa Rica a boron-based fertilizer,
Menorel, has been economically applied. CCB- type (6-10%), CCA- type
(5-8%) and copper sulphate (10%) are also used successfully but require
longer treatment times than boron salts. Fixing-type preservatives
may cause a blockage if the culms are not sufficiently fresh. With
increasing concentration the time allowed for sufficient penetration has
to be extended.
From
the outset the preservative has to be carefully mixed with clean water and
stirred, and the required concentration checked by pH meter or hydrometer.
As solution impurities will hinder flow it has to be filtered before
filling the container and again just before entering the manifold system
of the culms. A double layer of nylon filter cloth or a fine online filter
with a paper filtering element is effective. If the treating solution is
not coloured (like copper sulphate) a suitable dye, like aniline textile
dye could be added, so that the modified solution can be recognized at the
top end of the culm. The colouring may reduce the reaction of boron to
turmeric/curcumic acid, which turns red with sufficient quantity.
Treatment
Equipment
The
treatment equipment is shown in Fig 97, as modified from a sketch by the
EBF (1999). It consists of:
A
closed container for the treatment solution to take pressure of 1.5
bar
B
tap for regulating the input of solution,
C
water pump machine or air compressor
D
tap for regulating the output of solution
E
pressure regulation tank
F1-F6
tap for regulating the solution flow to the nozzles of the manifold outlet
G
collection tank for surplus preservative
H
tap for bleeding air from the nozzles before solution enters
I
nozzle with rubber sleeve and clamps to seal the pipe-culm joints
J
collection of outflow
K
bucket for solution
The
tank must be able to stand the pressure applied. As the preservative may
be corrosive, heavy-duty plastic should be used for all components.
Treatment
Procedure
As
in any other treatment operation the workers have to observe the safety
instructions
The
butt-end (never the top) of the freshly trimmed culm is clamped into a
rubber sleeve tightly above a node to avoid it slipping. There are several
types of rubber sleeves and plastic fittings with clamps in use (Fig. 98).
It is most important to secure a tight seal. A long tapered rubber nozzle
can adapt to a wide range of bamboo diameter, but should be covered by a
sleeve of fibreglass or wrapped in cloth to avoid ballooning of the rubber
sleeve. When the pump is turned on the pressure will first withdraw the
air in the pipe through a bleeding valve. Only when the solution flows
into the bucket can the bleeding valve be closed so that the liquid is
pushed into the water-filled vessels. In the past this valve has been
neglected so that the air inside the pipes and the rubber sleeve has been
pushed into the culm, thus reducing flow considerably and adding to the
treatment time. If no bleeding valve exists the culm should be placed much
lower than the preservative tank so that some air might escape before
treatment begins.
If older culms with a lower moisture content or culms in the dry season
are to be treated it is recommended that they be treated with clean water
first to get better saturation and then switch over to the preservative
solution tank. A corrugated iron roof sheath or plastic sheath should be
placed under the culms to collect liquid spilling from the nodes (Fig.
99). For treatment of single culms a bucket hanging at the end could
collect the outflow.
Once
pressure has commenced the sap should flow within minutes from the top end
and should continue to stream out displaced by the preservative solution (Fig.
100). This will first drip from the vessels at the lower culm part and
only later cover the whole cross section. The very first part of clean sap
can be withdrawn, later the outflow has to be collected and might be
re-used as it contains an increasing amount of preservative.
The treatment
can be stopped either when the volume of the outflow has reached at least
10% of the solid volume of the culm or when the concentration of the
outflow corresponds to the original concentration of the treating solution.
This can be measured by its density with a hydrometer and also by its pH.
A medium-sized culm will release about 1-litre of sap/solution. Treatment
time and success depends on the bamboo species, its origin, age and
moisture content, culm length and wall thickness, the preservative, the
pressure applied and on logistics. In general, culms of 150 mm diameter
and 6 m length are treated in 30-50 minutes and those of 9 m length
in 60-70 minutes with a pressure of 1.0-1.3 bar (15-20 psi, 1 bar = 15 psi).
It
should be taken into account that the determined density of the solution
becomes unreliable with time because of the increasing amount of sap and a
possible bacterial contamination of the sap. There is little information
so far about the effect of sap/sugar on the measurement of density,
neither on the precipitation nor the toxicity. The possible interaction of
borates with sap has yet to be clarified before possible extended
application. The common re-use of the outflow may cause problems, as also
its safe disposal, especially in the case of non-boron preservatives.
The
earlier simple bicycle pump by Purushotham et al. (1954) was applied for a
pressure of 1.0 to 1.4 bar (15-20psi) and could be transported by bicycle
or car for treating the culms directly in the forest for their use in the
villages. Such simplified transportable installations are now again in use
with motor-driven pumps.
A
stationary High Pressure Sap Displacement (HPSD) Method has been developed
by FRIM, Malaysia, with CCA preservative (12.1%) and a pressure of 1.4-4.0
bar (20-60psi) (Choo and Gan 1998). Higher pressure requires stronger
pipes and clamping systems and may cause leakage from the nodal cuts.
Diffusion
Phase
After the culms have been treated they must remain fresh and be
stored horizontally above ground under cover for 1-2 weeks. The storage
allows the necessary diffusion of the mobile salt components from the
preservative filled vessels into the surrounding tissue of parenchyma and
fibres. Boron-treated culms should be protected from rain to avoid
leaching from the ends and nodes and against sun to minimize cracking
during drying.
Main
advantages of the modified sap-replacement treatment are the limited need
and cost of the technical equipment, the rapid treatment procedure and the
complete penetration of the culm with a clean surface, thus avoiding any
risks. The solution can be recycled for a certain time, although further
investigations are needed. Care must be taken regarding spillage and the
safe disposal of residues as well as a possible leaching of boron treated
culms in soil contact. As the sap-replacement process has been applied in
several countries, some modifications have been developed for
simplification and efficiency such as the system applied by Cusack (1999)
with a standing treatment tank made from heavy plastic (Fig. 101).
A
detailed description of the process and its modifications has been given
by the EBF (1994); González and Gutiérrez (1996); Cusack (1999) an INBAR
TOTEM (Rao 2001).
and
Liese et al. (1998/2002).
|